Book Arts Resource Guide

This Spring semester, I took a reference course (INLS501) from Stephanie Brown of UNC’s Park Library in which we were asked to create an online guide on the topic of our choice for whatever audience we wished.

My topic guide, found at, presents a basic introduction to book arts knowledge,providing an accessible starting point and memory aide for students and practitioners of book arts and history of the book.  Book artists connect with one another online, through collaborative works, or workshops.  Book historians often relegate themselves to historical observation and conferences.  The two communities overlap occasionally at workshops—typically through the Rare Book School—so they share a basic vocabulary.  Even with the proliferation of these and other communities centered on book arts, however, it’s challenging to locate centralized information that covers all of the aspects of the art.

Book arts encompass many interdisciplinary branches of craft; relevant branches include binding, calligraphy and illumination, conservation and preservation, digital media, history, papermaking, and printing.  To explore the forms expressed in book arts, one needs access to materials from print encyclopedias to technical videos.  The collection from which I’m selecting includes all online (primarily free) materials concerning the branches of book arts and suggestions made by book artists and art librarians in my acquaintance.  I prioritized illustrated resources with an eye towards application.  For example, I selected the Advance Reading Lists from the Rare Book School, which provides online subject-specific reading lists for 80+ courses.  The scope includes bookbinding, bibliography, history of the book, illustration & printing processes, manuscripts, and typography & book design covering 800AD – 21st century.  I also selected items like John Carter’s ABC for Book Collectors. This illustrative dictionary covers technical, historical and contemporary book terms from 15th century – 2004. It is available online as a PDF.

Edits made after presenting a draft of the site to the class

After presenting to the class, Stephanie directed us to link items only when they were available online.  This forced me to realize that narrowing the print collection to any physical collection, and therefore to a geographic location, didn’t allow the coverage needed to best serve the book arts community (originally I had also been pulling from UNC’s libraries).  Most practitioners and historians locate their materials online, making geographic limiters arbitrary.  The presentation, friends’ comments and INLS501’s emphasis on avoiding superfluous information informed my choices.  The design is spare and I narrowed the home page to the necessities, gutting a section on access and eliminating the section on navigation.  I focused on placing visual cues like links, bullets, and images in key areas.

Because of the interdisciplinary nature of most of the resources, I decided against individual posts themed around a book arts branch, since the additional scrolling and more complicated navigation scheme negate the virtue of tagging.  Instead, I identified each column as traditional or contemporary, a division more pertinent to my audience than disciplinary splits.

For audience preference and because of the digital comfort levels displayed in INLS501’s examples, my tabs divide print and electronic resources; many in the community operate online, but sometimes the physical offers advantages like concrete ownership and the ability to mark up the text.  Based on presentation suggestions, I simplified the resource descriptions and removed unnecessary buttons.  I also made other changes, like adding a pipe symbol to delineate between the other buttons, avoiding jargon and enabling white space.

Creating this guide displayed the effort required for instruction, making me reconsider performance and assessment metrics while indulging my drive to disseminate information and introducing me to a fascination with HTML.

In the future, I will find the code to enable more white space between the columns.  I also plan to add tabs for topics such as ‘Related Topic Guides’ and ‘Book Arts Organizations’

Servant Leadership

This summer is going to be a busy one.  The Georgia O’Keeffe Museum Research Center took me on as an archival intern and I’m enrolled in an online management course for information professionals, both of which just began this week.

Our first formal assignment for the management course was to choose and explain a theory or philosophy (see list of choice at bottom).  I selected Servant Leadership and found it fascinating, so I’m sharing it here as well.  Enjoy!

Servant Leadership is both a philosophy and a tool kit or practice that operates under the assumption that a group empowered by a leader that serves it is more likely to succeed on both personal and group levels in the long term.

As a philosophy:

While visible in religious teachings reaching back centuries and spanning the globe, Robert K. Greenleaf grounded the concept (and coined the phrase) of Servant Leadership in a management context in the 1970s.[1]  In his chapter entitled “Servant Leadership,” he argues that leadership is secondary—any instinct to lead must first come from a place of service, a desire to help others.  Those with the ability to serve “hold the key to [their] greatness,” as well as the greatness of those they feel compelled to serve.[2]

Servant leadership stands in opposition to authoritarianism in that it’s meant to foster confidence and success in those served.  The servant-leader can empathize with obstacles their community members face while looking ahead to obstacles that might crop up, serving others by helping them navigate around hindrances.

The way Dr. Kent M. Keith phrases it really drives home the philosophy’s relevance to library science specifically:

“[Being a servant] is not about being servile, it is about wanting to help others. It is about identifying and meeting the needs of colleagues, customers, and communities.”[3]

Any librarian looking to serve her community must identify and empower others to meet their needs.

As a toolkit:

The Mind Tools Editorial Team put together a solid list of the behaviors needed to cultivate an environment in which servant leadership is made possible:

  1. Listening
  2. Empathy
  3. Healing
  4. Awareness
  5. Persuasion
  6. Conceptualization
  7. Foresight
  8. Stewardship
  9. Commitment to the growth of people
  10. Building Community[4]

(For a more in depth explanation of each of these qualities, see the Mind Tools website, found in footnote 4).

When all of these behaviors come together in a servant-leader, that person has the power to “leave a huge legacy to those around them.”[5]  From this, you end up with happier workers who are working both for personal growth and gain, as well as for the growth and gain of the larger community.[6]

The disadvantages:

  • This approach definitely requires a solid amount of time to foster a trusting, supportive, empathetic environment[7]
  • It shouldn’t be used alone—it needs to be paired with other leadership approaches (which actually could be an advantage, if you think about it)[8]
  • No one has mentioned this in what I read, but I foresee this sort of approach not necessarily working with individuals determined to put in the least amount of effort

 For a more in depth look at what it means to perform servant leadership, see the University of Kentucky’s Community Toolbox chapter on the topic: Community Tool Box. (2015). Servant Leadership: Accepting and Maintaining the Call of Service. In Leadership and Management (Section 2). University of Kansas. Retrieved from

[1] What is Servant Leadership? (2016). Retrieved May 14, 2016, from

[2] Greenleaf, R. K. (1977). Servant leadership (p. 19-20). Retrieved from,%20Servant%20Leadership.pdf.

[3] Keith, K. M. (2016). Definition of Servant Leadership. Retrieved May 14, 2016, from

[4] Mind Tool Editorial Team. (2016). Servant Leadership: Putting Your Team First, and Yourself Second. Retrieved May 14, 2016, from

[5] Heskett, J. (2013, May 1). Why Isn’t “Servant Leadership” More Prevalent? Retrieved May 14, 2016, from

[6] Keith, K. M. (2016). Definition of Servant Leadership. Retrieved May 14, 2016, from

[7] Ibid.

[8] Mind Tool Editorial Team. (2016). Servant Leadership: Putting Your Team First, and Yourself Second. Retrieved May 14, 2016, from

Continue reading “Servant Leadership”